Multiculturalism attempt to destroy national identity: UK speechwriter

Andrew Neather, who worked for Mr Straw when he was Home Secretary, and as a speech writer for Mr Blair, claimed a secret Government report in 2000 called for mass immigration to change Britain’s cultural make-up forever.

The damage is done. There is no return to the “old days.” Just like in Italy, France, hell, all of Europe and North America. US national identity has been destroyed. It is why homogenous nations like China, Japan and Korea are destined to rule the planet. Like it or not. The only model country that probably is competent with this plurality has been Brazil. But that country was founded that way. So in the end we are witness to the death of Europe and North America done in by our own self hating kind.

If any of you actually lived in places like Japan, Korea, China — Japan especially because they are having a population demographic problem where there are too many old people that will never be replaced — you would realize that many countries around the world do not subscribe to this idea of “multi-culturalism” because they realize it destroys national identities and keeps people segregated, alone, and into combating camps. It is not racist to proclaim you do not want mass immigration — it is survival. Indeed, we have been brainwashed for decades in North America and other Western nations that we must embrace mass immigration for many reasons including the most popular: population growth and population decline.

‘Dishonest’ Blair and Straw accused over secret plan for multicultural UK
By Simon Walters, Mail on Sunday Political Editor 25th October 2009
Jack Straw and Tony Blair ‘dishonestly’ concealed a plan to allow in more immigrants and make Britain more multi-cultural because they feared a public backlash if it was made public, it has been claimed. The allegation was made after a former Labour adviser said the Government opened up UK borders partly to humiliate Right-wing opponents of immigration.
Andrew Neather, who worked for Mr Straw when he was Home Secretary, and as a speech writer for Mr Blair, claimed a secret Government report in 2000 called for mass immigration to change Britain’s cultural make-up forever.

The academics talk about how “industrialized” countries are not reproducing their populations fast enough and that immigration is needed to replace those people. This is a blatant lie because an easy solution would be to provide incentives to people to reproduce — giving them money and providing support or something along these lines. Indeed, Russia has been paying their people large sums of money to reproduce because they too do not subscribe to this nation-destroying idea of mass immigration of peoples with dissimilar cultures and values. It is quite simply mass madness.
Similar attempts to destroy western culture are taking place world wide. The US is struggling under the weight of millions of illegal immigrants who have been flooding the country for 30 years. Australia, New Zealand and Canada are experiencing the same thing, and many European countries are also being flooded including Denmark, Holland, France, Spain, Germany.


“So now the cat is well and truly out of the bag. For years, as the number of immigrants to Britain shot up apparently uncontrollably, the question was how exactly this had happened. Was it through a fit of absent-mindedness or gross incompetence? Or was it not inadvertent at all, but deliberate?”

The idea that multi-culturalism was to be used to destabilize a country, combined with mass debt inductions, as well as a destabilized economy from “free trade” is nothing new and has been written for many decades, but mainly relegated as “conspiracy theory,” but for the past few years as many countries have seen, this theory is more reality than fiction.

Criticism of multiculturalism often debates whether the multicultural ideal of benignly co-existing cultures that interrelate and influence one another, and yet remain distinct, is sustainable, paradoxical or even desirable. Nation states that, in the case of many European nations, would previously have been synonymous with a distinctive cultural identity of their own, lose out to enforced multiculturalism and that this ultimately erodes the host nations distinct culture.
Other critics argue that multiculturalism leads directly to restrictions in the rights and freedoms for certain groups and that as such, it is bad for democracy, undemocratic and against universal human rights. For instance, Susan Moller Okin wrote about this question in her essay “Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women?” (1999) (Wikipedia, 2009).
The hidden agenda is more scary than we think. They appear to be following the 1928 manifesto of The Frankfurt School. A Marxist organisation based in Germany in the 20’s and 30’s. Mass manipulation and control of the populace.
To further the advance of their ‘quiet’ cultural revolution – but giving us no ideas about their plans for the future – the School recommended (among other things):
1. The creation of racism offences.
2. Continual change to create confusion
3. The teaching of sex and homosexuality to children
4. The undermining of schools’ and teachers’ authority
5. Huge immigration to destroy identity.
6. The promotion of excessive drinking
7. Emptying of churches
8. An unreliable legal system with bias against victims of crime
9. Dependency on the state or state benefits
10. Control and dumbing down of media
11. Encouraging the breakdown of the family
The outrageous truth slips out: Labour cynically plotted to transform the entire make-up of Britain without telling us

It was done to destroy for ever what it means to be culturally British and to put another 'multicultural' identity in its place. And it was done without telling or asking the British people whether they wanted their country and their culture to be transformed in this way.